A long time ago, I covered a previous Seiko Bell-Matic â an early 1970s watch with a mechanical alarm.
That watch now rests with a Sean, a fellow in the USA whose other half bought it for him as a graduation present. A lucky chap. Great taste, too.
I managed to acquire another similar watch, with a grey face, that wasnât in quite as good nick but not very far off. It came from eBay, and a less-good watch was later bought & then sold to harvest the âcoffin linkâ bracelet that now adorns this one. Here it is with its blue, departed, cousin:
Theyâre both reference 4006-6031 â the blue one is from October â72 while the grey one is from April of the same year.
Seiko did a load of other case styles for Bell-Matics, too â most had 17-jewel movements but the odd rare one with 27 jewels shows up, alongside some with 21J. The Jewel count is basically a way of a watch maker to brag how well theyâve manufactured the movement; it tells you that this thing will last for a long time since the jewels are what stops metal rubbing against metal inside the beating heart of a ticking watch.
Seiko even did a brand called Business Bell, only for a few months, in an attempt to sell to higher end buyers. Clearly it didnât work well.
But the Bell-Matic range ran from 1966 until 1978, and there were all kinds of case styles and dial colours.
Here is one that Malcolm bought â a November 1974 4006-6040 â at a watch show, with me nodding on as to say it looks like a good âun.
Sadly, it proved to be in need of a service shortly afterwards⊠as youâd expect from a 40+ year old mechanical thing that might have lain still for 20 years, and had all its oil dry up. It ran fine â for a while, then stopped.
The problem with complicated mechanical things is, it can take a fair bit of time and skill to disassemble, clean, oil and reassemble them â so the cost of servicing can be a lot more than the watch is actually âworthâ or at least what it cost in the first place. Watch cost maybe ÂŁ150, service more like ÂŁ200.
This next one arrived to me as part of a punt at an auction, that proved to be similarly expensive â why the hell did Seiko produce such similar but still distinctly different watches at the same time?
Itâs a July 1977 4006-6080, was completely DOA, and took a couple of hundred ÂŁÂŁ to bring it up to scratch, though it looks the part now. Ho hum,
Finally, at least for now, is a beautiful deep-blue from September 1977, and like Malcolmâs above, is a 4006-6040. It was listed by the auctioneer as âalarm not workingâ but that means they just didnât know how to work it; it runs and rings just fine, though who knows what horrors await at what might be its first ever serviceâŠ
In the meantime, itâs a lovely thing. Ring a ding ding.